In reality, this is only a convenient though fallacious assumption. In reality, Clearance is always concentration dependent. The question is how much, or how little?
Regardless of the processes involved, clearance can be represented by the expression Vmax/(Km+C), where C is the concentration of drug, the Vmax and Km are the rate max and concentration at 0.5Vmax respectively. From the expression it is obvious that Clearance is always concentration dependent. It is only fixed at the extreme ends of the range, where either C = 0, when Clearance becomes the 'intrinsic Clearance', or at the other extreme where concentration is infinitely high.
The maximum concentration-dependence is seen when the concentrations are approximately 0.1Km to 10Km, when there is a 'linear' relationship between Clearance and concentration. This is the range where we empirically label the kinetics as being 'zero-order'. Outside of this range, particularly where the concentrations are less than 0.1Km, the concentration dependance reduces towards a minimum.
So Clearance is always concentration dependent. Most therapeutic drug concentrations are in the range that is fairly low compared to the Km of the elimination processes (or we hope they are), so we comfort ourselves in being able to make the assumption that the drug pharmacokinetic behaviour is consistent with first order kinetics. But this is merely a convenient assumption. Most drugs are likely show various degrees of a mixed first to zero order pharmacokinetic behaviour.
A minority of drugs tend towards an overtly zero order behaviour, e.g. ethanol, omeprazole, phenytoin...... In the next post, we will examine the pharmacokinetic behaviour of one such drug, ethanol.
I want to thank you for this informative post.I really appreciate sharing this great post. Keep up your work.Thanks for shearing about this I thinks its very hopeful post and very important post for us.
ReplyDeletePharmacogenetic test