The issue of clarithromycin and increased cardiac deaths #5 - How can we deal with the variability?

Clinical efficacy is never only about therapeutic efficacy. It is always a balance between benefits and risks. Drug response variability shapes the clinical efficacy curve by altering the relative distance between benefits and risks along the dose or concentration range. Good therapeutics therefore is always about being able to manage the variability in drug response, so that the optimal dose or concentration for the patient can be selected that will maximize benefits and minimize risk.

If we just consider the anti-microbial effects.... we actually manage the variability rather badly. Theoretically, there is a therapeutic target that is based on maintaining drug concentrations at the target site (where the bugs are actually growing) above the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC). By drug concentrations we refer mainly to the trough concentrations. Therapeutically, the assumption is that if we dose according to published guidelines, we will achieve target concentrations at the site of action. In reality, we do not know that for certain. In fact, we have absolutely no idea whether we are dosing too much or too little, and basically act on faith that a certain dose (quantum and frequency) will allow trough concentrations at the site of action to exceed the MIC.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of clarithromycin had been proposed, but has never ever been taken up seriously for it to be included in routine patient management.

This is fine, if there were no serious toxicities, because you can administer more drug than really necessary just to make sure you have adequate concentrations at the target site. However, clarithromycin use does carry a serious risk of toxicity....namely sudden death. Therefore the correct dosing schedule is important to deliver only adequate levels of clarithromycin so that the troughs are over the MIC and the peaks do not approach the IC10 of IC20 of HERG channel blockade.

Currently we have no means to doing this.

On the flip side of the coin, there is the problem of cardiac toxicity. Although there is a considerable gap between routinely achieved levels of clarithromycin and the IC10 or IC20 of HERG channel blockade, obviously this gap can sometimes, though rarely, be crossed. The Danish study suggests this might be happening at least in 37 out of 1 million dosing regiments. How do we monitor and manage this? Routine ECG to look for QT prolongation would certainly be helpful. But this is almost never done during clarithromycin use.

Effectively therefore we have no means to manage variability where clarithromycin use is concerned. There is an over-dependence on published dosage guidelines, and faith in the adequacy and safety of these guidelines. Am I surprised by the association with cardiac deaths? Definitely not. Understanding the pharmacology of clarithromycin, this risk is predictable. The risk is not high. But one sudden death occurring in a relatively healthy individual, no matter how infrequent, is one death too many.

Can we do better? Yes.

The issue of clarithromycin and increased cardiac deaths #2 - Pharmacology

Clarithromycin is a macrolide bacteriostatic antimicrobial that came onto the market in 1991. It enjoyed considerable success as an orally administrable macrolide, being relatively lipophilic and having a slightly longer elimination half-life. Came off patent about 10 years ago.

It acts by inhibiting bacterial protein synthesis by blocking the ribosomal RNA. Resistance develops as bacteria acquire various resistance genes, such as the plasmid erm (A) gene that confers an ability to methylate the adenine in the binding site.

Clarithromycin can be administered orally with a bioavailability of about 50%. Its permeability across biological membranes is only due in part to its lipophilicity. A significant part of the process depends on a complex interplay between influx and efflux transporters expressed on various membranes. Consequently intra-cellular, and tissue concentrations do not correlate with circulating unbound drug concentrations. Interestingly, tissue interstitial fluid concentrations are lower than free drug concentrations in plasma, but intra-cellular concentrations are to a variably extent much higher than plasma free concentrations.

The protein binding of clarithromycin is about 60-70%. The Volume of Distribution is about 10 L/kg, which is consistent with significant permeability into tissues. Again this increased permeability results not only from lipophilicity but from the complex interplay of influx and efflux transporters, in this case clearly favouring influx.

Clarithromycin is eliminated by both hepatic metabolism and renal elimination. It is extensively metabolized by CYP3A4 (which it also inhibits), to a principal metabolite 14-(R) hydroxyclarithromycin, which is also pharmacologically (less) active. The pharmacokinetics is not linear, and the elimination half-life increases from 3-5 hours at lower doses, to 5-7 hours at higher doses. Tissue concentrations persist for much longer.

Clarithromycin produces a range of adverse reactions, but the one that concerns us for this discussion is with respect to cardiac death. Like many of the macrolides, clarithromycin has an effect on the myocardial delayed potassium rectifier current, leading a prolongation of the QT interval of the ECG. This prolongation of the QT interval is associated with risk of torsades de pointe and a fatal ventricular arrhythmia.

The usual adult dosage is 250-500 mg 12 hourly for 7-14 days.

Clarithromycin is a drug with very interesting pharmacological properties. Give a thought as to how these properties contribute to variability in the clinical response and the risk-benefit ratio particularly with respect to the problem of cardiac death.

(To be continued)

The issue of clarithromycin and increased cardiac deaths

Just this last week I was discussing with my students, the various factors contributing to variable drug response, and possible differences in the risk-benefit ratios for the same drug in different individuals. The recent publicity about increased cardiac death risks associated with clarithromycin provides a useful case study for many of these issues. Follow these posts for a discussion about this interesting issue.

The original publication about this can be found here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4138354/

Essentially, this Danish study looked at a large sample (n=160,297) of patients treated with a 7-day course of clarithromycin. The control groups were patients who been treated with roxithromycin and penicillin V. They found an excess of 37 deaths per million doses of clarithromycin compared to penicillinV. This is a very small though statistically significant increase in risk. The risk appeared to be contributed largely by an increased risk primarily among women. No increased risk was observed for roxithromycin.

As in many epidemiological studies of this sort, the design is far from perfect and there are always ways to cast doubt on the significance of the findings. It is not necessary for this discussion to arbitrate on this matter. Rather, this report serve as a context for us to consider the various mechanisms that may contribute to inter-individual variability in the risk-benefit ratio for a drug such as clarithromycin.

(To be continued)